Talk:Mass Effect 2: Overlord/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Red Phoenix (talk · contribs) 00:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All right, let's get started, shall we?

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
I had to tweak one duplicate use of the word "pack", but otherwise the prose reads reasonably well. There are a few patches that could use a little tweaking from an experienced copyeditor for sentence fluency, but none of these are major enough to get in the way of this review.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Very nicely done with the sources. All appear to be reliable per WP:VG/S per their usages in the article, and everything appears quite well referenced. Aesthetically, I'd double-check to make sure all references come in number order when using more than one in a sentence, but again, not in the way of this review.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Hits all the major points of a video game article: plot, gameplay, development and release, and reception. More than enough real-world content to balance off the fictional elements.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
No point of view issues I can see.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Does not appear to be the subject of edit wars.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Two fair-use images. Both have good rationales and are used appropriately. No other images are used.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Well done! I'd say we have enough to pass right away. Let me know if you have questions.

Red Phoenix ^{build the future...}_{remember the past...} 00:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You just beat me to this one, Red Phoenix! Congrats, Niwi, on another quality contribution. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to both of you. I wasn't expecting this review to be so good and quick. Cheers :) --Niwi3 (talk) 09:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]