This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This article should not be speedy deleted as the historic manufacturing company in question should be considered notable as an early participant in the manufacturing of automobiles in Sweden. The company is NOT the same as what we today know as Scania, and if considered so, then Vabis can't be considered notable on its own either. The Scania company today is by most means a continuation of Vabis, not of this company.
I also notice that the majority of the articles (mostly stubs, really) created by the user nominating this article for deletion are less notable than this one, and that the user failed to use the correct criteria. (I therefore personally see this nomination as being semi-invalid, but leave it up to others to decide its validity.) --Bergenga (talk) 12:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]