Jump to content

Talk:Mash Off/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 09:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice job. May we use a better image of Naya? The one here is horrid, yet she is actually very lovely! ;) Rcej (Robert)talk 07:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let DAP388 weigh in, but there aren't a lot of Naya images available on the Commons, and none are particularly great. There's the "Naya Rivera by Gage Skidmore.jpg", which we tend to use a fair amount—and it does face into the page, which helps. Perhaps with a different one of Cory as well, if that's the choice: "Cory Monteith 2011 Venice High School-1.jpg" is about the same aspect. Or there's another one of Naya: "Naya Rivera by Jiyang Chen.jpg". Since, if at all possible, pictures should not be looking out off the side of the page but into the center of the page or straight ahead, it probably makes sense to replace them both if you have a problem with one of them even without that factored in...
A fairly decent source (though it's missing one each of the Naya and Cory photos above) is the task force free-use images page. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Should be good to go. :) —DAP388 (talk) 19:02, 30 December 2011‎ (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Mash Off passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass