Talk:Masashi Hamauzu/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Support- Mostly referenced article, I see no reason why it can't be a GA. It could use a picture though.--ZXCVBNM 03:33, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- So it passed? As for the picture thing, see my response here. The Prince (talk) 13:04, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- The most glaring issue I can see is the complete lack of references for the first paragraph. Maybe you could try fixing that.--ZXCVBNM 18:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- If you're referring to the lead, then it's not necessary as per WP:LEADCITE; if the lead is a summary of the entire article, then only the body needs to be sourced. The Prince (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. Since nobody else seems to care, you pass, hey, go crazy.--ZXCVBNM 23:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well, you're the one that decides. GA reviews are only done by one person. The Prince (talk) 23:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. Since nobody else seems to care, you pass, hey, go crazy.--ZXCVBNM 23:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- If you're referring to the lead, then it's not necessary as per WP:LEADCITE; if the lead is a summary of the entire article, then only the body needs to be sourced. The Prince (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- The most glaring issue I can see is the complete lack of references for the first paragraph. Maybe you could try fixing that.--ZXCVBNM 18:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)