Talk:Maryland Route 537/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will be reviewing this article. Hello32020 (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Review Checklist
[edit]One of the shortest good article candidates I've seen, regardless, it appears to be comprehensive. The lead surmises the rest of the article efficiently. Both the MD 537A and D and MD 537B and C sections seem to detail their course fully and the major intersections section appears to be flawless. The history section provides a relatively detailed description for such a small highway. Additionally all of the rest of the criteria seem to be fulfilled. Good job. Hello32020 (talk) 21:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: