Talk:Maryland Route 10/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 17:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll take this one. Not right now, though. –TC N7 JM 17:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Pasadena and Glen Burnie only need to be linked once each.
- Done. V C 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Route description

allowing access between MD 177 and the direction of Baltimore. I can't really understand what this is saying, honestly.
- I rewrote that part to remove the confusion by explicitly stating what the ramps do. V C 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History

The middle of the second paragraph is pretty choppy. Maybe use conjunctions to combine a couple sentences?
- Can you explain which sentences you think need work? V C 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - The freeway from the Beltway to Furnace Branch was under construction by 1972; the highway opened from the Beltway to MD 710 in December 1972. MD 710 had been relocated in conjunction with the construction of MD 10 and the Beltway in 1972; the portion of the Beltway from MD 2 to MD 10 opened at the same time. The Arundel Expressway was marked as MD 10 by 1974. Construction on the extension south to MD 648 was underway by 1975. Kinda reads like a list, in my opinion, maybe with the exception of the first phrase of the second sentence. –TCN7JM 02:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I rewrote most of those sentences. Let me know how it looks. V C 00:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Looks better! –TC N7 JM 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Major intersections

Normally, I'd criticize on your use of both commas and semicolons in the junction list, but I can see how it works here.

That's it. I'm putting this on hold so you can fix stuff. –TC N7 JM 17:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review, TCN7JM. V C 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]