Talk:Maryam Faghihimani
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Copy Editing
[edit]I believe I have addressed the issue the page being too much a listing of her academic achievements. As such I hope I have resolved the issue. If more needs to be done I would gladly collaborate with someone. DaltonCastle (talk) 03:36, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Now on to the notability issue. I will search for more sources. I do believe her to be a notable individual given her media coverage to date. Nonetheless I will search for more. DaltonCastle (talk) 04:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for acting on my suggestion. Currently the most promising independent reliable references (Boston Herald, Tablet) are used to cite facts about her personal life, whereas her professional career as an academician, activist and writer is what she is supposed to be notable of - I would like independent references support these claims rather than references that are clearly not independent of her (LinkedIn profile, CCDD, Professional Women). Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 06:47, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hm, you are absolutely right. I will get right on this. DaltonCastle (talk) 07:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
I believe I have addressed the notability issue with the addition of new reliable sources. Hope its good to go now. DaltonCastle (talk) 19:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
[edit]@Nerd1956: hello there! Thank you for reaching out. What in particular are you hoping to add to the article? My main concern was that your edit removed a considerable portion of reliably sourced content. What specifically needs to be added, in your opinion? I'd be happy to collaborate. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)