Talk:Mary Pinchot Meyer/Archive 1

pls note

The following three sections are a discussion between two suspected sockpuppets and a retired editor. Since they don't relate anymore to the current article state I have archived them. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the movies

i think i may write a script about her actually, it would make a good movie for sure, we need to beef up this article people, ill do some investigative work myself, yet come on wikipedians, this beautiful ladies story is incredible!!! Someone put a picture up!!! I wonder if he really destroyed the diary, perhaps, yet it would be worth a fortune if it were still around, an absolute fortune...83.78.160.112 00:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

do we include the line from the ex-husband cia agent

do we include his (Cord Meyers) reported statement far far later near his death that he believed the same people that killed kennedy also killed her? Someone have confirmation of that somewhere? Pretty sensational this one. I was never too into the Kennedy assassination thing, yet her story gets me more interested, and her untimely death with 2 hit style shots to the back of the head and one to the heart is highly suspicious to say the least...anyways its stories like this that can help us shed light on roman times and greek times, to see how things like this work, its invaluable these modern stories for the classicists 83.78.160.112 00:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sourcing

This article is extremely poorly sourced. It includes only one reference, replete with a spam link to amazon. Its placement does not indicate whether it is intended as the sole reference for all claims. Hopefully, it's not, as it is rather difficult to judge the reliability of a single source of that sort. I have tagged it, to encourage improvements. Derex 06:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well that was a link to the book and its synopsis...read the book if you want to know more and get your hands on the books various sources, i have never seen anything but the synopsis to the book, yet i think we can agree a synopsis of a book on amazon is going to be an accurate valid source of that synopsis, until you find another source for the synopsis i think it needs to stay, ill cruise around the net to look for more myself. and i wanted another reference than just the spartacus site, and as to removing the spartacus site you have given no reasoning...I'll discuss the spartacus site on the kennedy page, as on that page its the amazon site i used to reference this material about her and not spartacus, and you seemed to have no problem with that on a highly read page like kennedys. I'll explain my reasoning there...here at least I think the spartacus reference can at least stay, it even has two nice pictures of her, its clearly a good source for her whatever your opinion of "spartacus" ...129.132.239.8 19:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do however agree that this article needs expansion and more sources as well in that expansion, this is a very interesting story...129.132.239.8 19:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]