Talk:Mary Lindell

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Red: Laureates (2018)

This article was created or improved during the Laureates edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in December 2018. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Lady-Lies

For contributors reading french and having this page in their watchlist: A french journalist wrote a book on may 2015: Lady Mensonges.

Regards, --Madelgarius (talk) 09:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revised text

Kattiel (talk) 20:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

An anonymous user repeatedly deletes the Controversy paragraph. Can you please do something about that? Kattiel (talk) 12:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

|answered=yes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kattiel (talk • contribs) 19:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talking in Article

The Le Foulon's research paragraph contains the sentence "Although Lindell took care of the evacuation of three British airmen to Great Britain via Marseille and the Pyrenees, historians did not find any other rescues what about Hasler and Sparks?." The last five words clearly belong under this Talk page rather than in the article, but the criticism seems to be valid, if Lindell is mentioned in Sparks' book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Hardy 54 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above words were added by an anonymous user. I have deleted them from the article. Don't have access to Sparks' book to check the criticism. Kattiel (talk) 12:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

The lead section mentions "to others she was a double agent" which is misleading since the allegations - described in section titled "Le Foulon's research" - are based only on one, non-academic, book by a journalist. Thus, IMO the article does not present a NPOV and certainly needs reliable (academic) references in relation to the allegations made. Coolmoon (talk) 10:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mary Lindell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222202024/http://static.bafta.org/files/peter-morley-a-life-rewound-part-4-194.pdf to http://static.bafta.org/files/peter-morley-a-life-rewound-part-4-194.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Mary-Lindell.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lindell a "German Agent?"

I don't have access to Le Foulon's book, but in the interview, Le Foulon calls Lindell a "false heroine" not a German agent. There's a vast difference between being a "false heroine" and a "German agent." You'll need a lot more evidence to apply the term "German Agent" to Lindell. Most of the sources about Lindell are favorable. She seems to have been an unlikable person, but resourceful. That she formed a good relationship with a German doctor at a concentration camp and defended him at his trial isn't proof she was a German agent. Just that she looked favorably on one German and was outspoken enough to say that. Possibly the "Stockholm Syndrome" -- or possibly her friend, the German doctor, was not 100 percent evil.Smallchief (talk)