Talk:Mary F. Hoyt/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 09:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Nominator: Doug Coldwell (talk · contribs) at 22:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
GA criteria
[edit]GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Comments
[edit]- Missing a short description
- Done
- "which was followed by hundreds of thousands of women filling these government positions" — Did Hoyt's appointment to federal civil service the main cause for 'hundreds of thousands of women filling these government positions', or is this just a trivia? Can we rephrase?
- Done
- "She was a centenarian." — For the lead, can we say that "She died in 1958, at the age of 100", with 'at the age of 100' piped to centenarian?
- Done
- "Hoyt was born in" — Full name should be mentioned on the first instance in the prose.
- Done
- "She is a niece of" — should be 'was a'
- Done
- "Her first job was a favorable position for a young lady" — I don't think this is too important to mention that it was a 'favorable position'
- Done
- "is a federal law established in 1883 which decided that" — we switch from present to past tense
- Done
- "US president Chester A. Arthur" — I guess it should be clear by the context the Arthur is American president. Remove US. And my reading of MOS:JOBTITLE is that 'p' in 'President' should be capitalized.
- Done
- "in the spring of 1883" — MOS:SEASON discourages the use of seasons to refer to a particular part of the year.
- Done
- "Hoyt produced the highest score" — is 'produced' the most appropriate word? How about received?
- Done
- "at an annual pay of US$900" — suggesting to use {{Inflation}}
- Done
- "A letter from President Dwight D. Eisenhower was delivered to Hoyt by the chairman of the United States Civil Service Commission, Harris Ellsworth." — which year?
- Done
- "Eisenhower's letter explained that a door had been opened for women's opportunities in civil service, and that she was the leader for these opportunities" — we should be either directly quoting his letter, or paraphrasing it. But I am not sure whether we should be saying "a door had been opened" or "she was the leader for these opportunities" or "Hundreds of thousand of women" in Wikipedia's voice
- Done
- "one fourth" — shouldn't this be "one-fourth"?
- Done
- "while working at the US Census Office" — was she at "US Census Office" or "Census Bureau"?
- Done
- "She took a hiatus" — might be worth explaining in the text what this is
- Done
- "Roger (b. 9/12/1889), Truman (b. 11/4/1893), Alan (b. 10/9/1894), and Elinor (b. 2/15/1896)" — Do we really need to mention the date of birth?
- Done
- File:US Treasury Department 19th century.jpg — If the author is "Government employee of 19th century", shouldn't it be {{PD-USGov}}?
- Done
References
[edit]- Suggesting to be consistent whether you use plain citations or specific citation templates.
- Done
- Ref#1 — Title of the news article?
- Done
- Ref#2 — Norwalk Hour should be The Norwalk Hour
- Done
- Ref#3 — missing title
- Done
- Ref#6 — Plain link; and why is Geni.com reliable to use? WP:RS/P#Geni.com states it is unreliable.
- Done
- Ref#12 — New York Times should really be The New York Times
- Done
- Ref#15 — Don't use all caps in reference titles
- Done
- Putting on hold – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for review. Will get started in resolving the issues.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Kavyansh.Singh: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, will take another look soon. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Looking much better; Promoting! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for review. Will get started in resolving the issues.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)