This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Intelligence Agency, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Intelligence AgencyWikipedia:WikiProject Intelligence AgencyTemplate:WikiProject Intelligence AgencyIntelligence Agency articles
I'm delighted to see two of my articles about Bowser cited in this entry. However, if one READS those articles, you will quickly see that nearly everything about Bowser in the wikipedia article is either inaccurate or unverified. Even claims about the Van Lews (whose lives are better documented, as was generally the case for wealthy whites compared to less well off African Americans) made in this entry are untrue. And the Thomas McNiven "recollections," while a delightful source for me as a novelist, is not something that historians (myself included) regard as highly accurate. This, I suppose, is the downside of the Wikipedia -- anything that's ever been "published" can be cited, even if it's highly suspect or completely unfounded. PLEASE, read the two articles I've written and edit this entry based on what they provide. You can also find a great C-SPAN program in which Elizabeth Varon and I discuss the challenges in separating fact from rumor when it comes to Bowser.
Done Thank you for pointing out these inaccuracies! The article now includes a section for items like this to be explicitly named as unsubstantiated or untrue, and at least a portion of the items have been removed from the rest of the article. Maintaining a list of claims and sources stating their status will be helpful for future editors and readers. —Verbistheword (talk) 20:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you for pointing out these inaccuracies! The article now includes a section for items like this to be explicitly named as unsubstantiated or untrue, and at least a portion of the items have been removed from the rest of the article. Maintaining a list of claims and sources stating their status will be helpful for future editors and readers. —Verbistheword (talk) 20:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)