Talk:Marvelwood School

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Mid‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Cclynch (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. ([1])

Student considerations

Not wishful thinking...but taken from marvelwood.org under new student body:

"Many of the students who enrolled at Marvelwood had also considered Cheshire Academy, The Gunnery, Berkshire School, Forman School and Storm King School." -

http://marvelwood.org/news/news.asp?LinkID=218&pageaction=ViewSinglePublic&ModuleID=36

Good grief! I'm sure some of those same students had "considered" Hotchkiss or Choate, only to be told they would be better suited for a school like Marvelwood. I hope you are not suggesting that since it's on Marvelwood's website, then it's what must be on a Wikipedia entry. The point in listing admissions rivals is not to include the other schools the Marvelwood student had considered, but which ones they were actually accepted at.

What you don't seem to realize is visitors to the Wikipedia site, such as consultants and prospective students and parents, ultimately see through this kind of chicanery. Hey, they can get it from Marvelwood's own propaganda machine. They probably thought they could come to Wikipedia for a different experience. Sadly, they will be disappointed if people like you have their way.

Wiffer 02:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was not implying that every piece of information on Marvelwood's website had to be on its Wikipedia entry - that would defeat the entire purpose of this endeavour. With that said, I do believe the school's website should act as a supplment to its Wikipedia entry because it's a credible source for information about the school - bottom line.

I think you missed the point about listing Marvelwood's admissions rivals on its Wikipedia entry. It has nothing to do with showing what other schools Marvelwood students had "considered" or as you put it, "were accepted at." It has more to do with showing what other schools are Marvelwood's peers.

Fair use rationale for Image:Marvelwood Seal.jpeg

Image:Marvelwood Seal.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undone Revisions

"The Marvelwood campus is relatively isolated, surrounded by conservancy lands, but provides an ideal environment for a small boarding school. The facilities were a significant improvement over those in Cornwall;" - an "ideal environment" is an opinion without anything specific to back this up. "Significant improvement" also is an opinion unless it is sourced.

"the 1960s-era buildings on the girls campus are in the midst of much needed renovations and upgrading including a new athletic facility, due for completion in October of 2007. The 50th anniversary celebration was a highlight of the 2006-07 school year." - this is repetitive information as it is detailed in the first paragraph.

BWH76 (talk) 11:25, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marvelwood School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928085802/http://www.rep-am.com/articles/2008/10/27/news/374668.txt to http://www.rep-am.com/articles/2008/10/27/news/374668.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]