Talk:Marvel Swimsuit Special

Marvel Swimsuit Special has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 3, 2019. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Marvel Swimsuit Special appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Marvel Comics published a parody of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue featuring artwork of superheroes in bathing suits?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marvel Swimsuit Special.

Wikipedia

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marvel Swimsuit Special/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 03:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review Kingsif (talk) 03:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsif: Hi, just wanted to inquire about the status of this review. Do you know when you'll be able to continue? Morgan695 (talk) 16:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Morgan695: When I remember I didn't finish it - I had it on a watch so it wouldn't have been much longer, but thanks for the ping! Pasted review below, sorry for the wait! Kingsif (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsif: Hi, edits have been made. Morgan695 (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Style

Lead could be a little longer, based on the overall length of the article
Development section written well - fluid and nice
Need a ref for "parody advertisements and fake interviews" sentence - I checked sources so I imagine it's in one of the nearby refs, but for ease, this warrants one at the end.
Not sure the Marvel Swimsuit Special #1 description should be presented as an 'e.g.' Perhaps replace as "One was the Marvel Swimsuit Special #1, which is set..." - or similar.
Coming off this, see coverage comment
Reception section good
Revivals section good
Needs attention one little thing

Coverage

Lead gives good coverage
Good coverage of development
May need some more coverage in Content, specifically having descriptions of the other comics as well as Marvel Swimsuit Special #1.
Good coverage of reception; perhaps a bit light on critics (only 4, though the series was prolific) but seems representative enough
Seems to use all available info about revivals
Needs attention one little thing

Illustration

Good use of table
Good idea to illustrate gender equality; good selection of appropriate images for it
Pass

Verifiability

Sources look good
Slight concern over Comicbook.com, but it seems reliable for what it is being used to source
Pass

Stability

History squeaky clean
Pass

Neutrality

Looks clear
Pass

Copyright

Check looks clean
All images fair use, with solid reasoning for each
Pass

Overall

on hold - see notes. Very close, just a few little things. Kingsif (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! Kingsif (talk) 21:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]