Talk:Marvel Knights

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Elektra

Finished Series or not ? :Brown Shoes22--Brown Shoes22 14:39, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Finished in 2003 by all accounts. I think the original writer may have been confused by the periodic Ultimate Electra minis. I have moved the link to the Finished Series section. Canonblack 12:59, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Daredevil

No Marvel Knghts tag on the cover, so isn't now not under Marvel Knight ?--Brown Shoes22 20:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel Knights as a team

I may be wrong but I think the actual reason for the formation of this team was to capture the Punisher and not to battle Ulik. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabknight2005 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I tried to update the page, and provide references. It's very important to note that Marvel is no longer saying Marvel Knights is outside of continuity. On the contrary, the banner is in the Marvel Universe 616, but a darker, stand-alone look at characters in that universe.

However, I cannot get the rest of the page to post. The edits are all still there, below the "production" section, when you click on "edit this page" but it doesn't show up.

I thought I did the "references" according to instructions.Myst3 (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Inhumans.PNG

The image Image:Inhumans.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image issues

The fair use of image:Inhumans.jpg in this article is questionable. Listed below is/are the reason(s) for this:
• Significance: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase, or its lack would significantly hinder, understanding the topic of the article. Full policy

Simply put, the identifying image here should be the imprint logo. This image may have a use later in the article, but it hampers understanding as used.

If the above concern(s) can be addressed in light of the relevant policies and/or guidelines, the image use can be retained. If not, the image needs to be removed from the article.

The issue with Inhumans.jpg has been addressed.

- J Greb (talk) 19:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image removed as it is improperly, and confusingly, used to identify the imprint as a whole. - J Greb (talk) 16:16, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canon or Non-Canon?

I was wondering if anyone can shed some light on this for me. I've assumed over the last few years that most if not all of the mini-series produced under the Marvel Knights imprint were considered non-canon (i.e Spider-Man: With Great Power..., Captain America: The Chosen, and Silver Surfer: Requiem). When X-Men: Magneto Testament came out I assumed that this was likewise considered non-canon, however, Magneto's Wikipedia page lists his real name as the Max Eisenhardt, revealed in the book's first issue. With the previously mentioned series not being considered canon, should this one be considered canon even though Marvel.com, which I would assume to be the truth according to Marvel itself, doesn't list any mention of Max Eisenhardt on Magneto's profile?--BigBang616 (talk) 08:24, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Foundation of the line?

All the information here is about the line getting folded into the main line. Any info on the foundation of the line and it's history? I know it started in the late 90s so why does the article begin at 2006? Also, the line got relaunched last year with Hulk, Spider-Man and X Men books. That should be touched upon in the article too. IrishStephen (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marvel Knights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130713105011/http://comicsalliance.com/marvel-knights-returns-spider-man-hulk-x-men/ to http://comicsalliance.com/marvel-knights-returns-spider-man-hulk-x-men/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marvel Knights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150317183205/https://www.shoutfactory.com/tentpoles/marvel-knights to https://www.shoutfactory.com/tentpoles/marvel-knights

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]