Talk:Marty Hogan/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article was nominated for good article status. The review began on September 14, 2009. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the six good article criteria.

I'll be reviewing this article for GA quality.--Giants27 (c|s) 17:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

St. Louis had been frozen out of the league championship. What is "frozen out"?

Fixed. Wizardman

Manual of Style compliance:

Only link things on the first occasion as I noticed a few links to Reading, Pennsylvania.

Fixed. Wizardman

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?: Pass

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Images need WP:ALT text.

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

Very close to GA quality, thus I'm placing this on hold to allow for the changes to be made.--Giants27 (c|s) 17:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks done now. Wizardman 01:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now passing the article, nice work.--Giants27 (c|s) 02:01, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate it.