Talk:Martin Mutschmann

Military history: European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

neopagan

there is no evidence, that Mutschmann was a pagan.Are there any certain sources? If not I will remove him from the category.--Samon93 (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bombing, Dresden

was blamed for not adequately preparing for the horrific bombing of Dresden which occurred from 13-15 February 1945.

what does this even mean? blamed by whom, the allies? Considering the key Allied argument is that Dresden was a "defended city", are they now going against their own claims and saying it is Dresden's fault for not protecting itself? Or is that just how, as a committed scholar who defends everything 'Allies', one protects their darlings from scrutiny, with a candle burning at both ends? Asdf12345sixseveneight (talk) 22:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]