Talk:Marks & Co
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marks & Co article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Marks & Co be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in London may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
[edit]I don't believe the book, 84CCR was "fictitious". I think the correspondence therein was genuine. 194.72.9.25 (talk) 14:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- Start-Class London-related articles
- Mid-importance London-related articles
- Start-Class Retailing articles
- Mid-importance Retailing articles
- WikiProject Retailing articles
- Stub-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in London