Talk:Market Opportunity Navigator

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: I wonder whether you could take a look at the last 5-or-so references on the current version. They seem completely out of place - biomedical papers from the 1970s, before the creator was (ah) active.

Klbrain (talk) 18:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Market Opportunity Navigator

Hello, Particleshow22,

Thank you for creating The Market Opportunity Navigator.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I struggle to find and real WP:SIGCOV on this topic as a notable subject by a high quality national WP:RS. The only ones are by Marc Gruber himself, which don't help WP:GNG? thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 11:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aszx5000: Thank you for taking the time to go through the article, I really appreciate it! I am committed to keep working on the article and I am keeping an eye on emerging review literature and sources to keep expanding and improving the page. I will ping you in any major future edit. Happy editing! Particleshow22 (talk) 16:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. Gruber (who's article I also cleaned up) is definitely becoming a major figure in this field (which I am familiar with), so perhaps it will attract more independent research. Also, is "The" part of the name or is it "Market Opportunity Navigator" - I found examples of both when searching? thanks and great work. Aszx5000 (talk) 16:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe both "Market Opportunity Navigator" or "The Market Opportunity Navigator" are valid, a redirect can be done to avoid confusion. Thank you for your kind comment and consideration of my work. Will keep improving the article when I get some free time.Particleshow22 (talk) 13:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aszx5000: Hi! Some new sources emerged (Bacq and Wang (2024); Sarasvathy (2024); Stevenson et al. (2024)) and I cited them and edited the article. Looking forward to your thoughts on this. Particleshow22 (talk) 08:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is good for me, marking the article as reviewed now and adding it to the Strategic Business Tools template. Nice work and thanks for sticking with it. Aszx5000 (talk) 12:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]