Talk:Mark Weinberg (judge)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mark Weinberg (judge) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Australia: Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal Mark Weinberg (judge) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Copyright problem

Unfortunately, the text of this article appears to have been copied or closely paraphrased from the copyright text at the FCA website. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation – including both structure and language – are. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following: The source says:

He graduated Bachelor of Arts / Bachelor of Laws (Hons) from Monash University, and BCL from the University of Oxford. He was formerly Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Melbourne. He was called to the Victorian Bar in 1975 and appointed Queen’s Counsel in 1986. He was Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions from 1988 until 1991.

The article says:

He graduated with a Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Laws (Honors) from Monash University, and with a Bachelor of Civil Law from the University of Oxford. At the University of Melbourne Weinberg was formerly Dean of the Faculty of Law. In 1975 he was called to the Victorian Bar. In 1986 he was appointed Queen’s Counsel and from 1988 until 1991 he was Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.

I've bolded the precise copying. Unfortunately, just moving the position of the dates or otherwise changing the order of the sentence is not enough to avoid the copyright problem. It is difficult when there are only a limited number of ways of saying something but the policy states: "... closely paraphrasing extensively from a non-free source may be a copyright problem, even if it is difficult to find different means of expression..."

As a website that is widely read and reused, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously to protect the interests of the holders of copyright as well as those of the Wikimedia Foundation and our reusers. Wikipedia's copyright policies require that the content we take from non-free sources, aside from brief and clearly marked quotations, be rewritten from scratch. So that we can be sure it does not constitute a derivative work, this article should be revised to separate it further from its source. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

If I can be any help, let me know.--CharlieDelta (talk) 08:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no complex wording to be plagiarized here. If you know how to say "At the University of Melbourne" in a unique way I would love to hear it. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)^[1] 10:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, there exists a policy on this very thing. The examples there are very relevant. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)^[1] 10:05, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely relevant,I agree, which is why I quoted the policy in my first comment. The issue is not so much that there are only a very few ways to say "...he graduated with xx degree from xxx University", more that the whole article appears to be a close paraphrase of the single copyright source. Ideally the article should be rewritten from scratch using information from more than one source. The section on How to write acceptable content is quite helpful on this point. However, I think the best thing to do in this case is to ask an expert to take a look.--CharlieDelta (talk) 06:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Weinberg (judge). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150301031707/http://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/home/about+the+court/our+judiciary/judges/ to http://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/home/about+the+court/our+judiciary/judges/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]