Jump to content

Talk:Mark Perakh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Criticism (or lack thereof)

[edit]

How come with every pro-ID entry there is you'll almost always find critics of their position listed. Mark Perakh's name pops up quite a bit, randomly, like "by the way, Mark Perakh thinks Granville Sewell's work is 'depressingly fallacious'". But you don't get that the other way around. You never hear that "Stephen Barr finds Perakh's work depressingly irrelevant". This isn't the fault of the author of this particular entry, but it is clear that one position seems to be more acceptable than others. --jorgeK

That's true: ID is not widely accepted within the scientific community. As for why his criticisms appear on ID-related entries, that's because people look for criticism from within mainstream science, and Perakh is very vocal and covers many areas that others don't address specifically. That's not say that his criticisms are the best (cf. my criticism of his criticism of Hugh Ross at Talk:Hugh_Ross_(creationist)#Accusation_of_psuedoscience), but they do exist. If criticism of Perakh can be found in as sources that are as reliable as Perakh's publications and self-publications, then they could be added here without giving undue weight, methinks. --Flex (talk|contribs) 18:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the honest reply on that, Flex. Again, it's not the fault of this particular entry that other entries have a large amount of criticism laced in, but the fact that you even took time to respond speaks highly of you. Thanks again. --jorgeK
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mark Perakh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mark Perakh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]