Talk:Mark Oliphant/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 11:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Initial thoughts
[edit]- Why is "The two men got along very well, dining at Trader Vic's in Oakland" releveant? Was it a regular or frequent occurence? Please clarify.
- It establishes the personal relationship between the two, which becomes important later on. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- " Lady Elizabeth Cockcroft who had died the year before" - the way this is written, it implies that they may have been more children, which there were not.
- I don't follow this. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Omitting the comma from " alongside Timothy Cockcroft, the infant son of Sir John and Lady Elizabeth Cockcroft, who had died the year before." implies that there were more children than the one who died.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- I added the comma; is it okay now? Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yep, all good. --Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 19:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- I added the comma; is it okay now? Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Omitting the comma from " alongside Timothy Cockcroft, the infant son of Sir John and Lady Elizabeth Cockcroft, who had died the year before." implies that there were more children than the one who died.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- I don't follow this. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- "the klyston capable of generating 400W" - do you mean klystron?
- Yes. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- " large-scale railgun which was used as a scientific instrument.experiments with plasma physics" - do you mean "instrument in experiments" or has some text been accidentally deleted?
- Yes. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
No copyvio found. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality: Yes -
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 20:12, 14 June 2013 (UTC)