Talk:Mark Konkol
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mark Konkol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110523061406/http://blogs.suntimes.com/neighborhoods/2007/04/historic_pullman_like_living_i.html to http://blogs.suntimes.com/neighborhoods/2007/04/historic_pullman_like_living_i.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mark Konkol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150815094601/http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/ to http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130203190220/http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/about-us/our-team/editorial-team/mark-konkol to http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/about-us/our-team/editorial-team/mark-konkol
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Tenure at Chicago Reader
[edit]I’m not a regular editor, but I looked up this guy and it appears that someone is scrubbing the fact that he was fired, let alone the circumstances under which he was fired. I’ve reverted it to be as inoffensive as possible, and leave it up to others to write up the controversial part, but the removal of *any* mention of the controversy suggests manipulation. Edit: the person removing this has only ever used their account to remove that section of text, going back four years. I think it might be Mark Konkol. Edit 2: this person also scrubbed entire the personal section claiming it’s “outdated” while citing no sources. This is definitely him, right? 2600:6C40:7500:1173:482C:818B:D189:6FD2 (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)