Jump to content

Talk:Mark Emmert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled section

[edit]

There is a user who is attempting to censor information that Mark Emmert is involved in legal proceedings. This information is pertinent to his position as president of the NCAA, and likewise pertinent to the already-existing information regarding the Jerry Sandusky scandal. This information belongs on the page. As I have discovered court documents cannot be used to cite, I am willing to change those sources to press releases. But there were other issues brought up by I am One of Many, including:

  • drawing conclusions;
--> If someone provides me with a conclusion drawn, I will revise it.
  • being biased.
  • being irrelevant.
--> The conversation about the scandal was already started on the page. What I added is additional information that has come to light through time, and it is highly relevant.

My proposed changes can be viewed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Emmert&oldid=609560316 Anyone care to weigh in? 97.123.232.199 (talk) 20:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced material and controversy section

[edit]

I removed some unsourced material. There is still quite a bit of material without cites. I also removed the controversy section title. --Malerooster (talk) 02:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The deposition PDF does not support a claim that Emmert directed edition of Wikipedia, and, in fact, suggests almost all such fact edits were made by underlings without being told to make them. Collect (talk) 18:27, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Mark Emmert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mark Emmert/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Dr Emmert's page reads like a public relations blurb. It's nothing but a listing of the "great strides" that the University of Washington has made during his presidency. He's a university president, but it doesn't tell us what he majored in as an undergraduate and what his dissertation work was about. It lists the institutions where he was previously employed but it doesn't say anything about what he taught.

It states that Emmert "turned down an offer from Vanderbilt University that possibly would have made him the most highly paid college leader in the nation", but doesn't mention that in 2007-2008 he was the second highest paid president of a public university in the nation, with annual compensation approaching $888,000 (Seattle Times online, 17 November 2008).

The article says nothing about his positions on corporate boards, and his generous compensation for that work, which at $340,000 is more than five times what many tenured professors earn. What does he have to offer Weyerhaeuser, for example, that's worth $140,000 per year for part-time work? Or Expeditors International, at $200,000?

In the Seattle Times (online, 7 April 2009), Dr Emmert had an opinion piece on keeping 'the "higher" in higher education'. While Dr Emmert's concept of "higher education" looks more like advanced job training to me, his article was about state of Washington budget proposals, and I sought some background information to put his remarks in context. This article lacks even a minimum objectivity.

Last edited at 17:30, 9 April 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 23:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Emmert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did the NCAA press office write this article?

[edit]

There are four citation needed tags in this section. It's eight paragraphs long! It needs way more citations.

There's only one article cited in the entire NCAA section. It was critical of Emmert, and has had text inserted after the citation was added that cast doubt on the quality of the reporting in the cited article, calling the cited article "misleading." (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Emmert&diff=prev&oldid=880111494)

It's blatently hagiographic and full of unsubstantiated, wishy-washy claims: efficiency and effectiveness was improved, he steadfastly advocated for student-athletes, he significantly increased support, rules have significantly improved, he called for swift and decisive action, a dramatic improvement in the basketball environment,

It's also making claims that must be backed by citations, for example it claims that his efforts led to a reduction in sexual assaults.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mark_Emmert&oldid=1257726689"