Talk:Mark D. Steinberg

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

Article is not vio-I am copy editing also link info has no copyright.LoveMonkey (talk) 02:59, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark, original texts need to be 'explicitly' copyright-free before they can be copy-pasted into Wikipedia. Also, you're not supposed to use Wikipedia to host your resume. This may help you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Your_first_article Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 03:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Professor Steinberg. There is no copyright posted on the link noted. I have used multiple sources not just copied resume. I have and am continuing to rewrite the article. As the article history shows.LoveMonkey (talk) 03:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand the word "explicitly"? Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me but you do know the meaning of the word RUDE? You didn't notice anything else I said? Is this what has become of wikipedia? Nice to know wiki doesnt need anymore contributions or people stupid enough to waste their time and do work here. Thanks for sharing the love there Simon-in-sagamihara. How many times are you going to not assume good faith and throw policy violations at me? Lets see you've violated WP:OUTING, WP:AGF. Gee I'm in the article rewriting it and your hopping up and down to delete it. Why am I wasting my time on this? Or someone rude like you?LoveMonkey (talk) 04:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

relax, everybody. I simply rewrote it. LoveMonkey, any CV on a faculty website is generally copyright either to the faculty member or the university. What one does, is to use the information there, for it's a RS for routine biographical details. But when one does that, one selects the important stuff, as most academic CVs list every possible publication and lecture. DGG ( talk ) 16:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent rewrite DGG.LoveMonkey (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]