Jump to content

Talk:Mark Aizlewood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Aizlewood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


trial over

[edit]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-42841660

©Geni (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mark Aizlewood/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 21:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


  • ”Five pound per week”. Pounds should be plural, I think. - Done
  • ”clubs player of the year”. Club's, I would think. - Done
  • ”Leeds own fans ”. Again, I would have written Leeds', with apostrophe. - Done
  • In the same place, can you explain why the v sign was such an issue? - Done
  • His time at Bradford City and Bristol City probably deserve more than one sentence.
  • Again, going from 1994 to retirement six years later could be expanded beyond two sentences.
  • ”club's 1–0 FA Cup victory over Premier League side Manchester City”. What round of the FA Cup is this in? - Done
  • ” a role wjoch ” - Done
  • ”The club made an strong start to the season and Rush was linked to the vacant Wales job but a difficult period in the second half of the season, winning just 2 out of 10 matches, saw the club fall down the table and pressure grew on Rush and his management team.”. Sources for all that? - Done
  • ”his first job in management”. Wasn’t his spell as an assistant manager his first job in management? - Done
  • ”He also developed a gambling addiction and has admitted to losing up to £30,000 in a single day.”. Source? - Done
  • ”thea fraud due toto a ” - Done
  • The fraud section is serious minefield, so much I’d expect an explicit source after every claim under BLP policy.
  • Has he begun serving his sentence yet?

Courcelles (talk) 21:54, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, I've made a quick start on these. Kosack (talk) 06:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Courcelles: I've expanded his Bradford and Bristol career as much as I can but I really don't have any sources to expand on this further. His Welsh Premier League playing career is as good as it's going to get as coverage of the league in its early days is basically non-existent. I thought I better bring this up before going any further if it's going to be an issue. Let me know if it's worth carrying on with the review, thanks. Kosack (talk) 11:52, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I can understand that. Please proceed, though it's worth noting you'd get a lot of scrutiny at FAC over this, at GAN I'm willing to accept it. Courcelles (talk) 16:59, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Courcelles: Thanks, I've finished off all of the other points raised above. I've added more references to the fraud section to ensure it's heavily sourced. Kosack (talk) 06:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good, promoting. Courcelles (talk) 15:44, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FAW Trust

[edit]

What is a FAW Trust? Article states it but doesn't explain it. MX () 14:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The first sentence has a link to the Trust's article. Kosack (talk) 14:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]