Talk:Mark's
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Bass Pro Shops
[edit]How is Bass Pro Shops related to Mark's Work Warehouse? Nastajus 13:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
La Ouerasse
[edit]I can verify that La Ouerasse preceded L'Equipeur in Quebec (it was quite controversial) but I cannot be 100% certain that 1992 was the year of the switch. Sounds about right, though. Shawn in Montreal 06:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mark's Work Wearhouse (2011)
[edit]You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Mark's Work Wearhouse, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 99.189.23.53 (talk) 14:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion (2011)
[edit]The store is well established and has received enough media coverage to satisfy Wikipedia's notability criteria. For instance, Canadian Tire's acquisition of the chain was a big enough story to warrant coverage on CBC and other national news outlets. —Psychonaut (talk) 16:44, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion - this article should not be speedy deleted because... (2017)
[edit]It is the only source of publicly-available information on this company and it serves a purpose in educating and informing the public on this firm. The main page, referenced articles and the page's talk section are valuable sources of known information on this firm. People who don't feel qualified/knowledgeable enough to comment on/edit the main article can still post important and relevant information in the page's talk section. The company is a large and significant player in the Canadian clothing retail landscape. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.117.224.112 (talk) 16:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- The article hasn't been listed for speedy deletion. There's no need to provide reasons why we shouldn't do something nobody has proposed we do in the first place. Bearcat (talk) 16:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Bearcat: I believe they're talking about the nomination above, which was proposed in 2011 and successfully fought against. They seem to keep reposting it though, probably thinking it's still in the process of being deleted. FosterHaven (talk) 00:13, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- The article hasn't been listed for speedy deletion. There's no need to provide reasons why we shouldn't do something nobody has proposed we do in the first place. Bearcat (talk) 16:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
L'Equipeur
[edit]A photo of a store and image of the logo should be added -- 65.94.170.98 (talk) 01:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Alberta articles
- Low-importance Alberta articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class Brands articles
- Low-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- Start-Class Retailing articles
- Low-importance Retailing articles
- WikiProject Retailing articles
- Start-Class fashion articles
- Low-importance fashion articles
- Wikipedia requested logos