Jump to content

Talk:Mario Balotelli/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: five found and tagged.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead does not fully summarise the article, please see WP:LEAD for guidelines.
    A number of stray sentences throughout which need consolidating into parargraphs.
    He scored a tie-breaking penalty kick into the Primavera league final 1–0 win over Sampdoria, prompting high praise from people including Inter chairman Massimo Moratti. ungrammatical
    Before the start of the 2008–09 season, Balotelli signed a three-year contract with Inter, the maximum length he could sign ungrammatical
    Please go over the article copy-editing again, read it out aloud to improve the prose and flow
    There is a lot or repetitive overlinking, please see WP:OVERLINK
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    five dead links as noted above
    Re-tagged as requested. This time CHECKLINKS found two archived versions. You can use this tool yourself.
    Otherwise references appear OK.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Good coverage.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Some vandalism by IPs, but this appears to be under control.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    tagged and captioned
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:15, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, all in order, please remember to get articles copy-edited before nominating at WP:GAN. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 13:06, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]