Talk:Marina Bay MRT station

Marina Bay MRT station is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 4, 2024.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 8, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
January 5, 2023	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

On 7 January 2018, it was proposed that this article be moved from Marina Bay MRT Station to Marina Bay MRT station. The result of the discussion was moved.

Fair use rationale for Image:NS logo.jpg

Image:NS logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Train service pattern to Marina South Pier

If most trains now terminate at Marina South Pier, why is the title of the article still saying that most trains terminate at Marina Bay? Someone please help to update the article's title. JaventheAldericky (talk) 16:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Headers

@ZKang123: Is it necessary for the CCL and TEL portions of the history to be titled as 'Interchange'? I don't see the need for it. R22-3877 (talk) 09:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tbh, I didn't label those headers. I mainly took care of the content.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marina Bay MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 00:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif (talk) 00:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Talk and history clear
Images all licensed
Images, map/diagram, and infobox all look good
Copyvio check fine
Sources all reliable enough, majority from Singapore gov't
Lead good length and good overview
Wikilinks used well
- Is there a link for Telok Ayer Basin?
- Promenade station should be linked
  - Unfortunately there isnt such a page yet. Regarding promenade station, it is already liked in the lead, but i have linked it again in the history section if that is what you mean. 1.02 editor (T/C) 02:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - A quick search on Telok Ayer Basin showed that it has became reclaimed land as part of Shenton Way. As of now I linked it to the list of waterways in Singapore.--ZKang123 (talk) 03:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Turn 900 metres to 900-metre by adding |adj=on to the template :)
- Ditto for '20 metres' a few lines down, and anywhere else a measurement should be in adjectival form Done
"World War 2" → "World War II" Fixed
Is there an update on Construction of the station has started in February 2008, with expected completion on 14 January 2012?

Fixed

Fix the entrance (Exit A) to the station have to be relocated to "had to be"

Fixed

Is it possible to spread the inline refs for the main Design paragraph through the paragraph, so it's easier to find which source is citing which bit of info?
Done actually most of the sources have repeated info, so i put each source at its most relevant position. 1.02 editor (T/C) 02:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is the repetition of 'the station' in The station showcases two artworks as part of the Art-in-Transit program for the station. necessary?

Fixed, removed repetitive clause.--ZKang123 (talk) 01:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

on hold A few things, explained above. Kingsif (talk) 00:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. Kingsif (talk) 17:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! 1.02 editor (T/C) 00:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

SMRT Trains Logo.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:36, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

SMRT Trains Logo.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

reformated

reformated Thalia the Nerd (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yo mom in my bed 2603:7080:8100:490E:3978:B4EA:8BE3:FA5F (talk) 23:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]