Jump to content

Talk:Marie Osmond/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: ChrisTofu11961 (talk · contribs) 20:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 03:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Good work as usual. Just a few minor touch-ups and we should be good to go.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  • I moved a few things around to vary the sentence structure a bit more.
  • Watch for Oxford commas (I prefer to use them), slang terms like "spawned" and "took his life", and overlinking (John Schneider is linked multiple times, for instance). Go over it to make sure you got everything.
  • Even if a newspaper source uses all-caps for the headline, fix it to use normal caps.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    I added a source to verify her full legal name and DOB.
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    I think the article does a good job at giving equal weight to her musical and non-musical careers.
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I went through and added alt text. While this is not mandatory, I feel it's easy enough to do.
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just do one more pass to make sure you got everything mentioned above, and I think we should be good.

@TenPoundHammer: Thanks for reviewing! I have not had enough time the last couple days, but should be able to go go through your edits tomorrow or early next week. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 16:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]