A fact from Marie Hartig Kendall appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article was created or improved during the May Mays edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in May 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Interesting life, on good sources, offline source accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed, and the perfect illustration, better than words. I find almost more exciting that she destroyed so many of her glass negatives, but otherwise lean towards the original hook. Both exhibition and blizzard are rather the exceptions. In the article, I'd mention the birth years of their children in brackets after each name (instead of "respectively), and not speak of her child. I'd combine supershort paragraphs and add an infobox, but all these suggestions up to you to take or not. Let's do this: I approve and if you come up with another hook, I'll check again. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt: Thanks for the review. I've added an infobox, combined some paragraphs, and reworded a few bits per your suggestions. I considered including a hook about the destruction of the negatives, but didn't feel that the sources I have access to addressed the topic in enough depth to do it justice. gobonobo+c08:46, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
Interesting life, on good sources, offline source accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed, and the perfect illustration, better than words. I find almost more exciting that she destroyed so many of her glass negatives, but otherwise lean towards the original hook. Both exhibition and blizzard are rather the exceptions. In the article, I'd mention the birth years of their children in brackets after each name (instead of "respectively), and not speak of her child. I'd combine supershort paragraphs and add an infobox, but all these suggestions up to you to take or not. Let's do this: I approve and if you come up with another hook, I'll check again. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
