Talk:Marie Christine Chilver

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marie Christine Chilver article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Intelligence / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Intelligence task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Espionage Low‑importance

	Marie Christine Chilver is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

"Chilver, who went by her middle name of Christine " says the Telegraph article. Christine Chilver, the original name for the article, would therefore seem to be the best place for it. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC).

And the BBC says "The agent, real name Marie Chilver"[1], so why not simply take her full name? Anyway, the "original" name of the article was "Marie Chilver", not "Christine Chilver", so that part of your statement is clearly incorrect. It seems more logical that she went by Marie Chilver in "real" life, and by her middle name "Christine" when acting as "Christine Collard", but that's guesswork to explain the discrepancy between the BBC and the Telegraph. Until we have more information, using her full name seems to be the safest (and is the name used in e.g. the Independent article[2]. Fram (talk) 14:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It may seem more logical, but it's not fact. Both the explicit statement by the Telegraph, the usage in the NA articles, the usage in Latvia and the comments by people who knew her, make it clear she went by Christine. Moreover it is standard practice in covert matters to keep, where possible, one's usual name, as one has to respond to it naturally. I have therefore moved the article per COMMONNAME. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:31, 25 October 2014 (UTC).

And I reverted, per the reasons above. Please, when you know that a move is contested, use WP:RM instead of making it regardless. The usage in Latvia is not relevant for the English Wikipedia though, it is the common name in English language sources that matters here. Fram (talk) 10:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marie Christine Chilver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319031500/http://www.dzd.lv/new/?w=main to http://www.dzd.lv/new/?w=main&animal=1&id=540eb2d248afe&lang=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]