Talk:Maria De Iorio

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Not an enciclopedic voice 5 reasons

The Wikipedia article on Maria De Iorio may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines for biographies of living persons or encyclopedic standards. Here are five reasons that could be considered for its removal:

1. Lack of Independent Sources: The article may lack sufficient reliable, third-party sources to establish De Iorio's notability. Wikipedia requires multiple, independent sources to verify the subject's significance in their field.

2. Notability in Biostatistics: Although Maria De Iorio is recognized in her field, the article may not demonstrate that she has made significant contributions that are broadly recognized outside specialized academic or professional circles, limiting its relevance to a general encyclopedia.

3. Self-Promotion Concerns: If the article is based primarily on self-published sources or institutional profiles (e.g., university pages), it might violate Wikipedia's guidelines against self-promotion or conflict of interest, which emphasize independent validation.

4. Insufficient Coverage in Media: If there is limited coverage of De Iorio's work in reputable media outlets or academic reviews, it may indicate that her work, while important in certain contexts, has not garnered enough widespread attention to warrant a Wikipedia article.

5. Overly Specialized: The content of the article may be too niche or technical for a general audience. Wikipedia aims to provide accessible knowledge, and if the article does not provide a clear explanation of her broader impact or contributions to the public, it might be considered too specific for inclusion.

These reasons would need to be carefully reviewed according to Wikipedia's deletion guidelines. 122.11.214.23 (talk) 05:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not even considering the appropriate notability criteria, WP:PROF #C1 (heavily cited publications), #C2 (major award) and #C3 (fellow of a major society). There is no self-promotion; the article was entirely written by me, as you would see if you looked at the history, and I am not De Iorio nor have any connection with her. The article is not promotionally written; it is merely a dry statement of the major milestones of her career. PROF notability has nothing to do with media coverage, and Wikipedia is not limited to general-audience topics like footballers and pokemons however much it may seem to be dominated by them sometimes. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:29, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]