Talk:Maria Alexandrovna Sechenova

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2019 and 10 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Itgel917.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

This article includes sufficient information to provide an overview of the woman's life. I would suggest changing the order of your subsections (putting personal life first followed by education and career and research) and rephrasing certain sentences such as the first two sentences under the education section and the "fell in love" part under personal life so that it sounds more neutral and reads more clearly (this is referring to the education sentences). Also the last two sentences under personal life can be moved to career and research. Other changes would of course be adding more information (I think it would be important to have more information under education and career and research because those are what she is most known for) and pictures. I think the most important change that could be made is adding citations/sources/links to back up your claims especially if you decide to keep your wording the way it is. Overall I think this is a good start and I would like to incorporate the way you go in depth on specific topics in my own article.Kristine Bridges (talk) 14:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]