Talk:Margaret Catchpole

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia

	Australia portal Margaret Catchpole is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dubious "facts"

Much of the article is wrong or misleading. It appears to treat Cobbold's novel as fact (yes I know he said it was all true, but it was a novel!) For a start, she wasn't born in Nacton. I'll do some checking of sources. Bluewave 14:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I endorse the above comment. Yet another book about Margaret Catchpole has been published (Scapegallows by Carol Birch, Virago Press 2007) using the material from the original 1845 novel by Richard Cobbold as the basis for her "true story".

The real Margaret Catchpole was nothing like the figure portrayed by Cobbold. He constructed an entirely fictitious family for her and none of the smuggling connection had any basis in reality.

The real Margaret Catchpole was the illegitimate daughter of Elizabeth Catchpole, born at Brandeston Suffolk on 14th March 1762. The identity of her father is unknown. Her baptismal entry appears in the register of Hoo Parish Church. She was rejected for some reason by her mother and brought up by her mother's sister Sarah Leader (the aunt Leader of the Cobbold book). No documentary evidence has ever been found about her life from her baptism to her arrest for stealing John Cobbold's horse in 1797. Her first trial for horse theft, her conviction and sentence to hang and its commutation ; her escape from Ipswich Gaol and subsequent capture; her second trial, conviction, capital sentence, further commutation and transportation to New South Wales were all covered in contemporary editions of the Suffolk Journal, a weekly newspaper published in Ipswich, and the Bury (St. Edmunds) Post.

There are several documentary references to her during her life (unmarried) in New South Wales and the entry for her death appears in the register of St John's Church Richmond NSW but the most important documents that survive are her original letters home to her Aunt Howes (another sister of her mother) and Elizabeth Cobbold. These are now shared between the National Library of Australia and the State Library of New South Wales. They are written in a phonetic style of English and when read aloud impart her strong Suffolk accent. They are possibly some of the most important convict documents from the whole of the transportation period.

I'm sorry to disillusion those who find the smuggling and romantic connection so beguiling but a study of the real Margaret Catchpole would show her to be far more interesting than the two dimensional character portrayed by Cobbold.

I'm not in a position at the moment to re-write the whole article in Wikipedia but hope to do so over the next few months.

Rjukanboy (talk) 00:32, 25 December 2007

Yes! Given that Cobbold invented her birth date, parents and later husband, you really can't rely on anything he said without checking it against another source. As you say, the Suffolk/Ipswich Journal is a great source for events in the East Anglia part of the story. Suffolk Record Office has an index to the Journal, which (I think) covers the period in question. Bluewave (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have done a quick review of the article adding an note of uncertainty to some claims and removing others. PeterEastern (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fact or Fiction

It says she was married in 1812 but wrote that she was unmarried in 1811. How does that preclude marriage in 1812? 86.139.161.23 (talk) 00:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret Catchpole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060820211327/http://gutenberg.net.au/dictbiog/0-dict-biogCa-Ch.html to http://gutenberg.net.au/dictbiog/0-dict-biogCa-Ch.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]