Jump to content

Talk:Marcus Dixon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disambiguation?

[edit]

I expected to find a page related to Marcus Dixon, the Rome, Georgia high school student who was convicted of child molestation in 2003. A couple questions: 1) Does anyone object to reogranizing this so that 'Marcus Dixon' is a disambiguation page, pointing to separate articles about the TV character and the real-life person? 2) Assuming that there aren't any compelling arguments not to do this, does anyone know how to do this well? I would be happy to take a shot at it, but I have a feeling that the result would be a bit of a mess. --Rkstafford 21:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well that Dixon doesn't even have a page to my knowledge nor do any of the links going to this article appear to be for that particular Dixon. For the time being, it would probably be better to put a disambig at the top of the page:
For the _____ see [[Marcus Dixon (whatever)]].
And start a page there. K1Bond007 22:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


What the hell is this TV crap? What about Marcus Dixon, the boy who's in jail for a crime that's no longer on the books? http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/dixon.asp Nice encylopedia. 70.142.192.106 17:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want an article about that Marcus Dixon, then create an account and write one. Move this article to Marcus Dixon (Alias) and then go through all the articles where it's linked and fix it, and then you can start the other Dixon article here. Otto4711 17:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And that's what I'm going to do! (I too was amazed wikipedia didn't have a page about the real Dixon!) Anyone who fancies helping out, I've added a few headers to start out! LookingYourBest 14:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potential violations of WP:BLP1E

[edit]

As per the discussion of this article at RFF, this article at present is a serious violation of WP:BLP1E, as well as a potential attack page; although it has seven references, by my reckoning five are invalid as reliable sources in Wikipedia terms. These issues urgently need to be addressed, otherwise this article will almost certainly need to be deleted — iridescent (talk to me!) 12:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering about this too, but I think this page was created because there was no Dixon v. State of Georgia page. I think that's the significant article here. I've read the case, but I'm not a lawyer and don't think I could do any justice to summarize it. It was a pretty important case both in the state of Georgia and nationwide. It got some pretty good media coverage, I believe the Dixon family and his accuser showed up on Oprah and other national television shows when the story was still fresh in people's minds. FantajiFan (talk) 06:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lindale, not Rome

[edit]

This occurred in Lindale, and Marcus Dixon was a student at Pepperell High School. I will adjust the page so that it gives the correct location.

Rebelyell2006 22:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Known For?

[edit]

I realise that now he has been picked up to play American Rugby, but I'd say that the majority of people who type his name into Google / Wikipedia will know him because of his court case. I don't want to get into an edit war over it though, I just think the page should reflect this fact. --LookingYourBest (talk) 11:28, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forget that actually, I've just removed the second infobox. I think the first bit get's the point across. --LookingYourBest (talk) 11:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by 205.173.105.210

[edit]

I moved this from the main article to here;

"In this Wikipedia entry for Marcus Dewayne Dixon, he is erroneously called a convicted rapist. This 'description' is outright false. He was never convicted of rape. As a matter of fact, he was acquitted of the rape charge. Rape is an act of forcible sex and Marcus Dixon was found to be innocent of that crime. Look at the facts of his case for reference.

Please correct this egregious error. It is very misleading to readers and damaging to Marcus Dixon, his friends, family, his employer, and his employer’s organization.

Thank you."

Every page I've read on Marcus Dixon says he was convicted of rape and was then acquitted later. If you can find a reliable source that states a difference then please show it and by all means change the page. Otherwise I feel the article is sourced well enough to state exactly what it states. --LookingYourBest (talk) 16:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Marcus Dixon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Marcus Dixon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Marcus Dixon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

[edit]

Over the past ... I'm not sure how long, the lede has been amended a number of times to the point where I'm not quite sure how's best to edit it for accuracy and I've been involved for a while on this page so I'm worried about WP:OWN. So currently we have ...

"Dixon is also known for being wrongfully convicted in May 2003 of molesting an underage girl, who was 15 (Sophomore) and Dixon 18 (Senior) at the time, while he was in high school. That charge was overturned by the Georgia Supreme Court."

Two things. 1: The case he was involved in seems important enough to still need a mention. 2: It currently makes it seem like Dixon was convicted on one charge and had that overturned, which isn't true. He was convicted of aggravated child molestation, which was overturned, but also with misdemeanor statutory rape, which he served time for.

Any suggestions appreciated. --LÒÓkingYourBest(Talk|Edits) 13:24, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Marcus_Dixon&oldid=1257990988"