Jump to content

Talk:Marco van Ginkel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Needs reverted to the last variation. He hasn't signed for Glasgow rangers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.153.137.85 (talk) 07:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 5 July 2013

[edit]

UPdate the player's current status

[1] Raghu4688 (talk) 17:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Need more information on what to change and where. Besides, article is no longer protected, so you can be bold and make the change yourself if you have the references all sorted out. Jguy TalkDone 01:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marco van Ginkel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Marco van Ginkel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Am I missing something?

[edit]

@El C and StarryNightSky11: you reverted edits as recently as 24 July about Van Ginkel making a permanent transfer to PSV Eindhoven, but according to [1] and [2] he has? Am I missing something? Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:44, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy: Hello, sorry for the late response, I've only just seen this and for some reason I wasn't alerted by your {{ping}} tag and I'm unsure if @El C: was notified either, after reviewing your references I've undone my changes to reflect the correct club he is now at (PSV). Any further questions or anything just message me via my talk page. Best StarryNightSky11(talk)(cont) 02:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@StarryNightSky11 and DatGuy: I did not get the earlier ping, either. I also did not revert (or edit, for that matter) the page, my only action was to semiprotect it (i.e. 0 byte change). El_C 03:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I pinged you since your protection reason included BLP violations and transfer speculation, despite referenced information being previously added [3]. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:46, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]