Talk:Marci Geller

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Possible sources

These were added as a block of wp:EL - but that is wayy too many. Maybe a few that are useful, but not good for sources.- Sinneed 02:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem with some of the sources, then you need to discuss them first here or in the AfD. You do not just remove them, as that seems to be an effort to falsely influence the AfD. If you have a problem with any of them, please feel free to discuss them with me here.

Also, there is no such thing as too many sources. If there are a lot, that just means they need to be steadily incorporated into the article, which is something that is done over time.

Please do not just remove my work like that again. Silver seren^C 02:24, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read wp:EL. Thanks.- Sinneed 03:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And please remove the explosion of ELs. Thanks. I will take them out tomorrow, unless there is a reason they belong.- Sinneed 03:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Linkfarm cleaned up.- Sinneed 04:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC) Expanding... leaving the tag in but moving on.- Sinneed 04:11, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky 13

Reviewing the links above, there is more of a case for a "Lucky 13" article, than for Geller, but even that seems very weak.- Sinneed 03:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sources have a lot to do with Lucky 13, yes, (so an article there could certainly also be made) but not all of them do, and they still have information pertaining to Marci Geller. How are the sources weak? Silver seren^C 04:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The "strongest" as I see it is the interview in the 2005 book. The rest are mostly appearance listings... those only go to show the group and the performer are real. Any garage band should have appearance listings, even if they have never made a dollar and no one will ever know their names.- Sinneed 04:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Benefit concerts are not the same thing as appearance listings. And the Times Beacon Record article talks a lot more about Geller and Lucky 13. Furthermore, the Connecticut Songsmith article also has a lot of information about her. Are those not notable? Silver seren^C 04:41, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Marci Geller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]