Talk:March Laumer

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Works in order of Continuity

First of all, I think it's a little silly to order things by Continuity. For example, the book The Magic Mirror of Oz is subtitled "The Oz Book for 1943", only the last seven chapters of thirty four actually take place during that year. The book starts in 1917, but most of the chapters do not take place in that year either. Some people would argue to label the book the year of its beginning, others would argue the year of its end, others would argue the year in which the most of the action takes place.

This is a problem that has cropped up in Oz circles before. I think it was the two collaborators on the HACC that first experienced this difficulty. And there are good arguments for the use of either. Both dates must be considered when deciding what took place during what.

Furthermore, the current list is wrong by ALL reckonings. ALL of China Dog took place after ALL of Careless Kangaroo, as did ALL of Uncle Henry. And I'm not even sure you can fit all of Laumer's books on just one continuity. I would place at least Fattywiggins and Crown of Oz in a completely different continuity, and it seems to me that Talking City was written mostly by Baxley, with only minor editing by Laumer.

The easiest way to make a list of books, in my humble opinion, is by publication date. This gives us only one date to keep track of, and makes everything much easier. Thus, I would prefer its use in this article. 172.130.157.143 (talk) 21:56, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I should reverse the placement of the lists vis a vis List of published Oz Apocrypha. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on March Laumer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071222182547/http://marchlaumer.4t.com/ to http://marchlaumer.4t.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]