Jump to content

Talk:Mar Lodge Estate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment on this article

[edit]

I'm afraid a lot of this reads like an essay or a research project critiquing the NTS management of Mar Lodge. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. I'm going to look at doing some re-editing to remove non-encyclopaedic material. Grinner (talk) 12:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I made the changes. Key points:
  • Reduce the number of very short sections/subsections, especially in the ownership section
  • Move work around (linked with above) to help things flow better.
  • Remove a lot of weasel words "interestingly", "controversially", people being "aware" as opposed to having opinions.
  • Rewrite to a more neutral viewpoints
  • Just generally make it read more like an encyclopedia article and less like an essay
I don't doubt for one moment that the current article wasn't written by a knowledgeable and passionate author, but it just wasn't really suitable for here: Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox
Grinner (talk) 09:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mar Lodge Estate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Requests & Proposed Changes

[edit]

If you'd like to contribute - you can consider making these changes, or suggest more :


Temporary

[edit]

a temporary storage of content

Coincidentally, this management philosophy was in-line with contemporary expert and official opinion - in 'The Regeneration of Existing Pinewoods' Ewen Cameron, Area Officer, Kincardine & Deeside, Scottish Natural Heritage wrote[1] :

It is important to recognise that we have to evaluate naturalness in a relative rather than absolute sense … there can be no intrinsic justification for using any given phase of the prehistoric pinewoods as a template for the natural or more natural pinewood that may be the objective of contemporary management … [that a] return to any former state would almost certainly be impossible from a purely practical point of view and arguably unnatural from an evolutionary point of view

– Ewan Cameron (1994)

Their minimal intervention policy continued[2] through the first decade of the twenty-first century with the estate's 'Management' web-page[3] stating :

The future of Mar Lodge Estate represents a great challenge: an attempt to develop a new and responsible form of Highland estate management by working in harmony with nature. In general, management will be based on minimum intervention; as far as possible leaving nature to take its course and simply monitoring progress … Following the reduction in deer numbers regeneration should occur naturally where native trees still remain. Through effective management of the deer population the use of deer fences, so evident on many other woodland regeneration schemes, will be unnecessary. Deer form an important part of any woodland fauna, and their exclusion is as unnatural as over grazing … Where it is considered appropriate, some man-made features – signposts, bridges, huts – may be removed in order to retain the feeling of wilderness on the tops

References

  1. ^ Ewan Cameron, The Regeneration of Existing Pinewoods, Proceedings : Our Pinewood Heritage, Forestry Commission, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Scottish Natural Heritage, 1994
  2. ^ 'Uphill task' for historic estate, BBC News, 13 July 2005
  3. ^ Management, National Trust for Scotland, 23 September 2010
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mar Lodge Estate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]