Talk:María José Cristerna

A fact from María José Cristerna appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 September 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Mexican lawyer María José Cristerna, known as "The Vampire Woman" for her extensive body modifications, is recognized as the most tattooed woman in the world?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/María José Cristerna.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Mexico

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No photo???

It's remarkable that this article is devoted almost entirely (the "biography" is three one-line paragraphs) to its subject's tattoos and other body modifications, yet there is not a single photo of her or of any tattoo. Surely, there are pictures of the "most tattooed woman" out there. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it's disappointing. Perhaps someone who attends a lot of body art events will upload some photos to Commons (be sure to obtain her consent though; remember, she's a lawyer). In the meantime, Google Images has a large selection of non-free ones. Nick Number (talk) 17:26, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Piledhigheranddeeper: We cannot just pluck any image off the internet, per the Non-free content policy. While Wikipedia uses non-free images in certain cases where no free equivalent exists or is capable of being created, WP:NFC#UUI largely prohibits non-free images of people still living. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And indeed, a freely licensed photograph has been obtained, and this article is now appropriately illustrated. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GRuban: Awesome. Thank you for the quick upload. Nick Number (talk) 18:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, good response (just what I hoped to accomplish in my original posting). --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 18:22, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]