Talk:Mapimí Silent Zone

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

wiki wiki

Clean Up Suggestions for This Article

I think this article takes too long to actually define the significance of the topic. It should be spelled out in the first sentence or first few sentences, at least in brief; and then expanded upon later in the article.

Also, in my opinion the article should contain some kind of disclaimer about the questionable nature of the claims and content in the article (about UFOs, etc.).--Skb8721 22:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of citations make the article unsuitable for wikipedia

The entire Myth section makes some pretty heavy calims and mentions some world famous landmarks, yet offers no citation whatsoever. Should it even be included in its present state? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.221.52 (talk) 18:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen worse... -Poodle of Doom (talk) 22:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheking the type to see if its correct or not

Its just à chevk Blablaoeeee (talk) 16:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Total BS take on this. Urban legend my arse.

I will never donate another cent to your liberal controlled site. There is so much actual scientific evidence to show this is a anomaly of an area and something is going on. 2601:2C4:C480:E3B0:9898:7727:187E:3720 (talk) 01:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]