This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
A user has being adding biased non-notable stuff into this small article, pulling dog-whistle after dog-whistle to counter a perceived spin in the article (I concede the debt stuff was woefully (and misleadedly) phrased and can be dropped out under that conditions, though). Pretty darn impressive pulling such stuff out of the hat given the huge amount of municipal policies out there that are both notable and "controversial".--Asqueladd (talk) 11:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How is it biased to add content from El Pais, a newspaper of record? If the Melilla stuff was gossip, why did their mayor respond? Funny we can have a whole article on Wikipedia about Donald Trump trying to run Sweden and rightly getting his arse kicked for it, but the mayor of Madrid making similarly out of scope comments about Melilla must be buried alive. Valentina Cardoso (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's a conspiracy... WHATABOUTISM at its finest. Anyways, why don't you start adding content about the city policies, which IIRC include plenty of the "controversy" juice you seem to yearn for (urbanization halts, contested measures towards enforcing the so called "historic memory", anti-pollution measures, low-participation consultations, et al.) instead of comparing mr. Trump to this missus for the sake of validating your bias.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
