Talk:Mansoor Ijaz/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

I removed this comment, by [[User:]], which I believes should more appropriately be placed here on the talk page:

Whoever wrote this article? Ijaz had oil dealings with sudan. Which means, either he was an unregistered lobbyist, or he had a conflict of interest. User:72.240.86.50 11:21, 2005 December 5 72.240.86.50

-- Geo Swan 21:29, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

From: "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them"

(Note that Al Franken makes sarcastic comments, so some of this is a joke -- like the last sentence.)

"In 'Let Freedom Ring,' Hannity outlines a charge that he frequently makes both on television and on the radio: that Clinton let bin Laden slip from his grasp. He writes,

It's truly astonishing, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and their liberal allies on Capitol Hill were offered Osama bin Laden by the Sudanese government, and they turned the offer down. They could have taken him into custody and begun unraveling his terrorist network almost six years ago. But they didn't. And now more than three thousand Americans have paid with their blood. That is astonishing. Hard to think of a more serious charge. You want to be damned sure you have that one locked down pretty tight before you put it in print.

But knowing what we already know about Sean Hannity [referring to a previous chapter in the book, dedicated entirely to this guy] and the standards to which he holds himself, what are the chances that this whole charge is just baloney?

“His entire case comes from a guy named Mansoor Ijaz, a Pakistani-American who claims to have transmitted the offer as a middleman between the U.S. and Sudan. I got the story on Ijaz from former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger and from Daniel Benjamin, past director for counterterrorism on the National Security Council and now senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Berger only had to meet once with Ijaz to determine that he was an unreliable freelancer, pursuing his own financial interests. Ijaz was an investment banker with a huge stake in Sudanese oil.

Ijaz had urged Berger to lift sanctions against Sudan. Why the sanctions? Because Sudan was and remains a notorious sponsor of terrorism, harboring Hamas, Hezbollah, and al Qaeda. Also, the Sudanese regime is the leading state sponsor of slavery and is considered by many to be genocidal. And totally untrustworthy. Ijaz, however, was arguing their case. As Benjamin said of Ijaz, 'Either he allowed himself to be manipulated, or he's in bed with a bunch of genocidal terrorists.'

Ijaz said that Sudan was ready to hand over bin Laden. The U.S. does not conduct diplomacy through self-appointed private individuals. When the U.S. talked to Sudan, there was no such offer. The U.S. pursued every lead and tried to negotiate. Nothing.

The story does have a happy ending. Ijaz now has a job as foreign affairs analyst for the Fox News Channel.""—Preceding unsigned comment added by KnowledgeReigns (talk • contribs) 00:20, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

While Mansoor Ijaz is a privateer (now Fox News analyst), the above section from Al Franken's book should not be taken as gospel since Mr. Franken bases the entirety of that excerpt on Sandy Berger who was convicted of stealing classified government documents. . Mansoor has had no such charge sully his reputation.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinnievesh (talk • contribs) 21:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Berger was convicted of mishandling classified documents, not stealing them. Pretty big difference. His statements are relevant but the 9/11 Commission's conclusion have since trumped Ijaz's conflicting statements.Gmb92 15:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

References

Wikified

Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 17:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Content removed

(Certain content was removed from this page on 8 February 2007 at 5.27pm GMT and must not be re-posted. Anyone re-posting it should contact DMH Stallard (UK lawyers for Mansoor Ijaz) using only the following e-mail address: comments@dmhstallard.com) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cupasoupdave (talk • contribs).

Article development

I removed deletion tag and improved this article a little. Biophys 17:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

The added sources make it more likely the topic meets WP:N. Please keep in mind that the Wikipedia article should be composed of facts about Mr. Ijaz from sources other than Mr. Ijaz himself. For additional information, you may want to check out google books. -- Jreferee 22:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for good advice. I will take a look as time allows. Biophys 23:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Too many books. I do not think this aricle is sibject of WP:N, but the US-Sudan story is really controversial. So far, the only source that explains it more or less logically is the article "Secret US emissary" (2nd external link in the article). Could you give me more specific hints/sources if you are familiar with this subject?Biophys 23:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

O'K, let's see a few "not so reliable" sources::::

• [1]
• Richard Clarke Top Seven Questions for Commissioners
• Hannity site

So, I think first source does not fit Wikipedia "good source" requirements, but we can include it as a link (why not?), and two last sources are O'K. Biophys 16:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC) Biophys 00:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

So, the most revealing source is this: The Journalist and The Terrorist. Vanity Fair by Robert Sam Anson. It says, for example: "But despite his talk of bin Laden's being "a man like an angel," Khalid Khawaja was sufficiently broad-minded in his allegiances that he got the Taliban to agree to receive Ijaz and ex-C.I.A. director Woolsey. " But is it a good source for Wikipedia? Robert Sam Anson is a well-known journalist, is not he? But the site of publication is suspicious (might be a complete falsification). Do you know any other and better place where this has been published? Biophys 01:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Unsourced statements

Please feel free to include any new information about Mansoor Ijaz, but always provide reliable sources, especially if they challenge his credibility or can be considered as defamatory. Otherwise, the text should be deleted immediately according BLP rules. Thank you. Biophys 04:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Just wandering. "On a show on Fox New representative Rangel of New York specfically asked as to what security clearance Mr. Ijaz has to claim such knowledge of sensitive intelligence information on US Security" So, what did Mr. Ijaz answered? Biophys 16:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I have to delete this for now. You are very welcome to re-insert everything back at any time, but only with appropriate references please.Biophys 17:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Mansoor Ijaz did not answer the question and as you can see he has not shown up on Fox news for over two years because his credibility went to hell, as even the Govt of Pakistan representative, Mr. Masood Khan, the current Ambassador of Pakistan to the UN in Geneva denied even knowing this self made liar. In fact this person claimed that his father was the founder of Pakistans Nuclear program, the problem with that statement was that his father moved to the US in early 60's when Pakistan did not have much of any nuclear program. trueblood 06:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Great. You may be absolutely right. It is perfectly fine to include all this information in the article. It would be interesting to know what exactly his farther did for the Pakistan nuclear program. But please provide some references that support such claims. It is the rule to have verifiable information. For example, was the statement by Mr. Masood Khan published anywhere? If it was, let's refer to it. Biophys 19:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Sure, I will get a letter from AEC of Pakistan concerning his father and post it here trueblood 05:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

In the original article Ijaz had someone make up the stuff about his father, he claimed that his father moved to the US in 1964. from the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission web site it says PAEC was started in 1964, so how could his father be father of PAEC if he had already moved to the US. see

http://www.paec.gov.pk/paec-hist.htm

Furthermore, all the things Mr. Ijaz has said cannot be independently be verified except from himself and his own statements on TV. So that is why fox news dropped him. He used his stupid statements to get on TV and than used that to raise funds from Arabs while being based in UK. HIs so called hedge fund cannot be located anywhere. So maybe a little research can prove all this trueblood 05:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Trueblood786, you seem to know the story about Mansoor Ijaz much better than me. Could you then take a look at the links in this article: "Mansoor Ijaz: America's Secret Emissary" and "The Journalist and The Terrorist. Vanity Fair by Robert Sam Anson"? How do you think: is it all fake? These sources claim that he had very good connections with US intelligence, and at the same time, with many political figures (to say this politely) in Pakistan.Biophys 19:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I have looked at those links, these were all made by anti clinton people who backed up their statements saying that Clinton was offered Bin Ladin by this man and Clinton refused. In an interview Clinton said he does not even know this guy. Guess what the same magazines were touting the WMD in Iraq, so if one says one thing long enough it gets printed and gets a life of its own. I know for a fact that Ijaz has absolutely no contacts in Pakistan Army. He belongs to Ahmadiya sect Qadiani who have some members in the civil service in Pakistan. But his claims about Kashmir are just that some stupid claims. trueblood 23:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

So, are you telling that the entire story about Mansoor Ijaz's involvement in US-Sudan negotiations has been invented by Mansoor Ijaz? The only thing he did - he testified before US Congress (reference 11)? Or maybe he did not do even that?. And you think that article "Secret US emissary" is anti-Clinton lie/fabrication. Same thing about Kashmir (that was a couple of publications by another journalist). Then, we definitely need more alternative sources here. Biophys 01:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

As you can see the quotations and sources all only quote ijaz in reference to Kashmir and Sudan. No one from the Govt of Pakistan, India or Kashmir, Sudan or the US government has ever confirmed any of the nonsense by Ijaz so I suggest that this should be listed trueblood 04:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Why are you putting all this propaganda for this guy, all he has done is make himself the source. On top of that he is no longer welcome on any of the news shows as they figured out that he had lied on most of his stories that he made up.

Please stop this propaganda. trueblood 22:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Cresent Group

This group has no relation to the supposed Cresent Managment Group LLC that has no address and no one kwnos where it exists. The Cresent Group is a well founded years old family company in Pakistan. This family has nothing in common with Ijaz trueblood 23:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello trueblood, You recently inserted the following: "Ijaz as usual gives himself as the source of the story. Because of this he is longer a expert for Fox News[16] [17] [18]. Did you want to tell that he is NOT longer an expert for Fox News? I did not find this in the sources.Biophys 01:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Have you seen him appearing on any news channels. He would stay up all night to be on Fox News now over a year he has not appeared. On one Fox news where he was with Congremman Rangel of New York he started to make a lot of unsubstatiated allegations about Clinton etc. and stated that he got these from his intelligence sources. Mr. Rangel than asked him that "if the intelligence people are talking to a man with no intelligence security clearance than that is against the law and a criminal act." At this Mr. Ijaz stopped talking and his apperances since than have diminished into nothing now." trueblood 20:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

No, I did not see him. In fact, I do not see FOX News any more (guess why?). I am not an advocate for Mansoor Ijaz, and I am not his admirer. But your assumption that he does not appear in the news because he is discredited must be justified by some source that satisfy WP:SOURCE. This is all. There are thousands of reasons why he might not appear. Your words about Mr. Rangel or anything like that ... if this is verifiable (please check), just go ahead and include this in the article. No problem.Biophys 22:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Ijaz credibility

Aside from being contradicted by the 9/11 Commission regarding the bin Laden/Sudan matter, Ijaz also appears to have a strong pro-Pakistan bias. Example:

CHAT PARTICIPANT: Is it possible that bin Laden has taken refuge in Pakistan?

IJAZ: I think it's unlikely, because Pakistani intelligence is now under the control of one of General Musharraf's most trusted aides. If this had been a month ago, one might believe he would be given refuge somewhere in Pakistan, but now the change in the ISI's leadership (Pakistani equivalent of the CIA), there's virtually no chance that bin Laden could take refuge in Pakistan, nor the Pakistan side of Kashmire, which is where some think he might go. http://archives.cnn.com/2001/COMMUNITY/10/17/ijaz/index.html Gmb92 15:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

EDIT SUMMARY

I have deleted SAUDI and corrected the record because Ijaz is an American born of Pakistani parents.

I have deleted "Billion dollar" in front of Crescent because there is no verifiable evidence that Crescent has such resources.

I have moved the paragraph below from the main page to the discussion page because the articles show Ijaz was clearly involved in the ceasefire effort (other articles also exist to demonstrate this) but clearly whoever wrote the opinion of why he is or is not considered a credible television analyst has an equally dubious agenda to the one he claims Ijaz has. This comment is therefore better kept on the Discussion Page because there could be a host of reasons why Ijaz is no longer a Fox analyst, including living abroad, which he is, or not coming to terms with Fox management, or the reasons set forth in the opinion comment below.

Readers should click the article links and read through them to judge on their own the truth or veracity of Ijaz's claims.

Ijaz claimed that he participated in ceasefire negotiations between Indian security forces and Kashmiri separatists in the disputed Kashmir region in August 2000. Ijaz gives himself as the source of the story. Because of this he is no longer an expert for Fox News[2] [3] [4]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IJILDIAIISMI (talk • contribs) 22:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

How do I use italics?

i recently inserted a subsection which I believe should satisfy both the left and the right,but it includes a quote from "the 9-11 comission" which should be in italics.

I am not sure how to "do" italics."

Would some kind soul help me out with this please?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.132.210 (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Secret audio tape of Hamid Mir’s (Pakistani Journalist) conversation with a Taliban associate of Hakimullah Mehsud

There has been a secret audio taped converstation which has been recently released in Pakistani media, which can be a crucial evudence on CIA's role in the War against the Taliban and and Al Qaeeda in Pakistan; in this converstaion, Mr. Mansoor Ijaz (Mansoor Ejaz) name has been mentioned 12 times. Here's a link to the conversation: http://criticalppp.org/lubp/archives/10918 Wikitanoli (talk) 22:51, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

1996

Instead of removing claims of 15 million dollar and 100 million dollar payments on the ground youve never heard of the source, how about you provide a source saying he did not get the money ? --Timeone (talk) 23:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Untitled

David Frum has an axe to grind with Ijaz over the Memogate affair. Each article he has written has bias, unsupportable commentary and is based on the information provided to him by the antagonist in the memorandum matter, Ambassador Husain Haqqani. There is no evidence in the public domain anywhere that Ijaz himself has made unsupportable statements with regard to bin Laden's possible extradition or not in 1996. The matter in any event is covered objectively further in the Wiki article on Ijaz under Statements on Bin Laden. The commentary posted (most likely by Frum or one of his associates) is biased, does not have any verifiable content and could be considered by Ijaz and his lawyers as slanderous and defamatory. Such comments may not be made according to Wikipedia rules.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Zalahind (talk • contribs) 21:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

First of all, you deleted two references, if I recall -- an article by David Frum, and another by Peter Bergen and Andrew Lebovich of the New American Foundation. Please don't tell me Bergen can't be trusted as a source on this topic. Second, Frum and Bergen are not the original sources regarding this accusation. The original source is journalist Richard Miniter, in a book he wrote. This has nothing to do with your personal suspicions regarding David Frum and Husain Haqqani. I will revert your edit and request that you explain on the talk page why you are discarding the use of Miniter's book as a reliable source.--Jprg1966 (talk) 22:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

The Miniter book has many different sources. Ijaz is not the source of the accusations over bin Laden's possible extradition offer - those are the ex-defense minister at the time, El Fatih Erwa, and others. If you read the book carefully, Ijaz appears in one chapter with regard to the Sudanese counter-terrorism offer he allegedly negotiated in April 1997 that is a matter of public record. See Ijaz's testimony in Congress in June 1997. See article reference in section dealing with bin Laden where Ijaz and a former US ambassador to Sudan jointly write an article about what happened. See VANITY FAIR article in December 2001 on efforts to bring bin Laden to justice, that include the perspectives of at least four person, including former US Amb Tim Carney. To say Ijaz has a "long history of fabrication" is not a substantiated statement when the section of the Wiki article dealing with the controversies he has been involved in already cover the pros and cons of each individual matter - Memogate being the latest. Such comments are perhaps better left in the Talk page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Zalahind (talk • contribs) 01:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zalahind (talk • contribs)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2014

Requested changes have now been made.

Ryuichinaruhodo (talk) 16:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Responded to comments regarding my edits on Ryuichi Naruhodo's talk page

Guffydrawers (talk) 17:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

The article needs a vast rewrite

The article needs a lot of re-writing. Most of it is not actually about the subject of the article. For instance the lead is not about Ijaz its about people who are close to Ijaz and fails to convey a summary about the subject WP:LEAD . Every section has the same weaknesses. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Formula One

As the intro is supposed to summarize the body, and there are currently no details about Formula One in the body (the overly-detailed paragraphs being removed), I think we have two options:

1. Remove the Formula One mention entirely (it is not a completed deal)
2. Add a short paragraph to the body, focusing only on Ijaz's involvement.

Thoughts? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Am I permitted to add thoughts, or is that a violation of COI and NPOV policies?--Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

As I've said to you twice already: "The accepted way for subjects of articles to influence/suggest content is to use the article's talk page - Talk:Mansoor Ijaz. Example: I think this should be changed [give proposed wording] because [give reason]. The more specific your suggestions are, the quicker they'll be addressed by another editor." So yes, please add your input here. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I did read your comment, but I felt I should ask in this space to make sure anyone else reading it would understand that I abided by the consensus rule. Do I just insert here the language or format or how is that to be done?

Also, do you think it is possible to archive some of the really old stuff on this talk page so we can more readily see what is being added on this re-write effort of the article? I do not know how to do that. Thanks for your help and showing me how this all works. Even if it is difficult to see it done in to my own person, I will do my best to bring some intelligent thoughts that hopefully fit the bill. By the way, the "hacking up" of my article language was also used by another thoughtful editor who saw it the same way -- USER:NYTTEND

--Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

You can add proposed language here for other editors to comment on. Please keep in mind why the previous content was removed - Wikipedia is a general encyclopedia, not a place to detail business dealings which are not that significant from an outside perspective. I've archived the old stuff. And Nyttend's comments were about why the article was protected four months ago, not the current round of edits. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, Neil,

My suggestion for the opening paragraph is as follows:

Mansoor Ijaz (Arabic: منصور اعجاز‎) (born August 1961) is an American financier of Pakistani ancestry. He is a hedge-fund manager and venture capitalist who was for some time a media commentator, mostly in relation to Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan.[1] He is the founder and chairman of Crescent Investment Management Ltd,[2] a New York investment partnership since 1990 that includes retired General Jim Abrahamson, former director of President Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative.[3] Crescent operates the CARAT System, a proprietary computerized mathematical model for trading currencies, bonds and equities that Ijaz designed in the late 1980s. Ijaz's venture investments include recent efforts to acquire, among other enterprises, a stake in the Lotus Formula One team.

If accepted, this would eliminate the need for a Formula One section or anything to do with my professional business affairs. It would require deleting the sentence related to CARAT in the Personal Life section. I have not included references, etc but I suppose your expert editing hand could find those readily from the original version before all this started today. I also have not put the Wikification links in for Lotus or italics/bold where it may have existed before.

I am making some further suggestions if it is okay once we get through this first one so I can see how the process works.

--Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

TheRedPenOfDoom is currently working on the intro. Let's see what he has to say. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:58, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

thanks for waiting for a response, I was having very poor internet connections for a while, which resulted in a really bad edit.

I have restructured the lead to cover what I have seen as the three major areas of impact: the Business, the Political, and the Commentary. hopefully now the lead more generally fills WP:LEAD giving the reader a quick overview of "Who is Mansoor Ijaz and why should we care?"

The body of the article does not really cover the business aspect at all and should be beefed up and can include a summary of the formula one stuff which does seem to be the content that is in the news lately. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Red Pen, can I make a suggestion on how the initial grafs would be better tidied up to meet the WP:LEAD criteria you set down? There are serious inaccuracies in your version, and factual misstatements. For example, there are three Times of India articles that state the US government -- and Pakistani government -- were exactly informed and backed my actions on Kashmir. The only issue is that the links are now down. If you wish, I can send those articles to you as they originally appeared in Times of India during the period where the intervention was taking place. You have based your entire material re-write on one source, and that is not a fully reported source. I have contravening information from equally credible first-hand reporting by the deputy editor of a major newspaper in India that says exactly opposite of what you have written. How do we fix that?

--Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 16:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

the lead

@Mansoor Ijaz: has indicated [5] that there are other reliable sources that have differing views than the one that I have used for the lead. user:Mansoor Ijaz, if those sources are avaialable on-line, please provide links, otherwise please provide the citation information: newspaper, date, headline at a minimum, author if you have it. Thanks. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

@TheRedPenOfDoom: has made one edit suggestion for the lead.

I would like to suggest a more accurate re-write based on factual data. I have not included references here in the text for ease of process. Those can be added later if the edit is agreed.

Mansoor Ijaz (Arabic: منصور اعجاز‎) (born August 1961) is an American hedge-fund manager and venture capitalist. He was for some time a media analyst, mostly in relation to Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan and the role of Muslim-Americans in US political life. He acted as an unofficial channel for communications in the past between the United States and foreign governments, notably of Sudan, India and Pakistan. He is founder and chairman of Crescent Investment Management Ltd, a New York investment firm since 1990 that operates a proprietary trading system, CARAT, developed by Ijaz in the late 1980s. Ijaz's venture investments include recent efforts to acquire, among other enterprises, a stake in the Lotus F1 Formula One team.

In the 1990s, Ijaz and his companies were significant contributors to Democratic party institutions and Bill Clinton.[3][4] During the Clinton administration's first and second term, when the US had severed official ties with Sudan, Ijaz worked as an informal communications link between Washington and Khartoum in an effort to gain access to Sudanese intelligence data on Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, who were operating from Sudan at the time.[4] Ijaz, who is of Pakistani descent[4], was also involved in efforts to broker a ceasefire in Kashmir in 2000-2001, and was a key protagonist in "Memogate", a controversy that alleged delivery of a memorandum by former Pakistani envoy Husain Haqqani through Ijaz to thwart an attempted coup by the Pakistani military after the death of bin Laden.[5]

TIMES OF INDIA ARTICLE REFERENCES (LINKS ARE DEAD):

1. TIMES OF INDIA, Sunday, 26 November 2000, "Ceasefire efforts fell prey to Pakistani Hawks", by Siddharth Varadarajan (text available if required)
2. TIMES OF INDIA, Wednesday, 29 November 2000, "Expat Pak Peacemaker had U.S. backing", by Siddharth Varadarajan (text available if required)
3. TIMES OF INDIA, Wednesday, 03 January 2001, "OP-ED: Indo-Pak Talks: Don't Make a Villain of Musharraf", by Mansoor Ijaz (text available if required)

GULF NEWS REFERENCE: http://gulfnews.com/architects-and-wreckers-of-the-kashmir-plan-1.287347

Please leave reference to my wife (who was my first wife) out of this article. --Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 17:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Minor error -- should be: "...Pakistani envoy Husain Haqqani through Ijaz to senior US officials to thwart..." --Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 17:30, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Red Pen,

Please remove the reference to my first wife in the intro paragraphs (she is now my ex-wife and her political contributions were her business, not mine). I am shortly asking for my User page to be deleted, so I would appreciate you making that change before the deletion becomes effective. --Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 00:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

I've done that as it seemed not important enough for the lede. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Washington Post/Free Republic archive

Can we find a better source for that link? The FreeRepublic link shouldn't be used anyway, but it doesn't even go to a text to support the claims. Thargor Orlando (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

@Thargor Orlando: Good afternoon, Sir. The article is from a date that has not been retained in the normal Washington Post archives. We tried during the edits with Wikipedia administrators Nyttend and FreeRangeFrog to find a direct reference electronically but could only get this one for free. The link chosen does have the article, but it has been somewhat redacted due to some limitation on how much they can include in one post...

There is one other site that has it stored in full text in its archives, and that is found here: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-718226.html, but it is a paid site. I have the article available from my own archives taken directly from the newspaper when it was printed, but that cannot be uploaded in Wikimedia due to copyright issues. I'm happy to hear any ideas on how we can help resolve this for you. Thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention. --Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 14:30, 29 March 2014 (UTC)