Talk:Mankurt

Central Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal Mankurt is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The movie Mankurt is redirected to Mankurt (1990 film). This (Mankurt) is a common term of Turkic Mythology. Buzancar (talk) 11:56, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mankurt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029185846/http://celestial.com.kg/articles/people/Persons/Writers/Chingiz-Aitmatov_150.htm to http://celestial.com.kg/articles/people/Persons/Writers/Chingiz-Aitmatov_150.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Literary invention, or older legend? Sources!

All the main sources sources are left completely opaque to non-Russian-speakers: most details are left untranslated (titles, publishers, etc.) and have no enWiki articles. As a result, there's no way an editor or user can assess how plausible and trustworthy they are. This is highly relevant - it always is, but here even more so, as Wiki articles in other languages, based on similarly intransparent sources, are claiming the exact opposite: the existence of an old Turkic legend.

Actually, the only Western source, quoted as the 6th one in the article, contradicts the definition from the introductory paragraph, which cites two Russian-language sources. In this, 6th source, we have "The mankurt motif, taken from Central Asian lore..." (Shneidman). Whom to trust?

Result: I can't trust the definition from the lead. Highly frustrating. Arminden (talk) 16:29, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whose "common parlance"?

"it has become a term in common parlance" - does this mean in common parlance in Russian? If so, shouldn't it say so? I've certainly never heard anyone use the word in English.

HairyDan (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. - Altenmann >talk 19:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]