Talk:Maniac Mansion/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing the article over the next few days. Below you will find the standard GAN criteria, along with a list of issues I have found. As criteria pass, a 
or 
will be replaced with a 
. Below the criteria you'll see a list of issues I've found. Feel free to work on them at any time. I will notify you when I'm done checking over the article. At that time I'll allow the standard one week for fixes to be made.
Criteria
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Issues found
[edit]- The box art could use {{Vgboxart fur}}, but the current rationale is quite strong so I doubt it'll be challenged in the future
- There are a few instances of misordered refs. They should be numerically ordered where possible
- After "would need a scripting language to create the game they had envisioned."
- After "allowed the developer to easily port Maniac Mansion to other platforms."
- After "and provided further coverage later in the year."
Still looking over the prose. Give me ~24 hours.
Reviewer: Teancum (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- I thought that there was a bot for automatically ordering refs. I haven't seen it around in awhile, so maybe it broke down. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
✓ Pass - I didn't find anything else. I don't have any time to do all of the legwork for passing the article at the moment (leaving for home) but I can do it later this evening. Nice work! --Teancum (talk) 21:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Many thanks! I hope we can take it through FAC without too much trouble. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)