Talk:Maniac Cop

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is ManiacCopFans.com not releated to Maniac Cop?

And if not, how so? Seems like an appropriate and relevant link for the article, especially considering it's the only site about Maniac Cop out there aside from the IMDB entry. No need to take your little "job" so seriously. Get over yourself. Max85 20:30, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

No matter how many accounts you use to spam this fansite into article, it will be reverted. Read WP:SPAM and WP:EL. IrishGuy ^talk 20:35, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm only using one account. There's no need for me to make multiple accounts. Good observation though. Check the IP address. Oltrelamorte 20:40, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asking others to edit on your behalf is a violation of WP:SOCK. IrishGuy ^talk 20:42, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't ask anyone to edit on my behalf. I've been singled out here because I've seen numerous other fansites allowed to be placed in the Wikipedia External Links section. One being a Danielle Harris fansite on her page. Oltrelamorte 20:49, 29 August 2007 (UTC)oltrelamorte[reply]

Really? Your message forum says otherwise. Should you continue to violate WP:SOCK you will be blocked. IrishGuy ^talk 20:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Still didn't see where I asked anyone to edit anything. There's a difference between asking someone to do something & informing someone about something. I commend you & your detective skills though. Oltrelamorte 20:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)oltrelamorte[reply]

So you complain about your personal inability to edit and others tell you they will edit in your stead. Then they do. But that somehow isn't sockpuppetry? If you don't want to get blocked, they had better stop. IrishGuy ^talk 20:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not even one of the people who runs the site, so I'm not "spamming" anything of mine. I just post on the forum. I added the link because it is a relevant link for an article about Maniac Cop. Max85 21:02, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

I still didn't ask anyone to do it. Go ahead & block me if that's what you want to do. Oltrelamorte 21:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)oltrelamorte[reply]

Good fansite

Currently a site is being removed under the idea that it's a fan site. However, there are no other external links, and the site seems informative, and seems to pass the "should be linked" section of WP:EL #4. Additionally, I see nothing under WP:EL that disallows the use of a fansite. The Evil Spartan 00:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The site is filled with copyright violations. The message board requires registration to even view, let alone contribute. In the links to be avoided section, this fansite violates 1, 3, 6, and 10. IrishGuy ^talk 00:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words, Evil Spartan but I doubt our site will be allowed to be linked now because of everything that's went down. Again, thanks for your kind words though. This is a battle we aren't going to win.

Oltrelamorte 00:20, 30 August 2007 (UTC)oltrelamorte[reply]

Removal of "needs infobox" tag

This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB. Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Maniacop-poster.jpg

Image:Maniacop-poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expand

Plot details would be useful. Danceswithzerglings (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

remake

This says there is a planned remake 174.44.44.43 (talk) 13:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/18165

Cult following

Can anyone offer any proof that Maniac Cop has received a cult following as it is claimed in the article? --GHcool (talk) 17:16, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maniac Cop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111115434/http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/maniaccopbluray.php to http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/maniaccopbluray.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of In Popular Culture

Can't you just put info about Two Trucks in "Legacy"? 2603:7081:1C46:4000:64A6:36D2:4CD9:F2B1 (talk) 21:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]