Talk:Manhunt (video game)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 04:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I will be reviewing this article shortly, so please bear with me here. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All right then. Here's my review:

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Shouldn't we include a development section in the article if possible?

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
I will wait for a few days until this article is passed or failed.

Hope these comments are helpful. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:06, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see here, I tried to add a bit of a "Development" section, but it's very difficult to find any development information, since searching up Manhunt on Google just comes up with a lot of police cases to do with "manhunts", and searching up Manhunt information or even Manhunt development only really comes up with information for Manhunt 2, even when you change it to Manhunt 1 development or Manhunt 1 information. Will this indefinitely stop the article from becoming a "Good article", or can someone fill me in here...? Thanks, Rhain1999 (talk) 10:58, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this will stop the article from becoming a good article, but I am going to pass it anyways. Also, can you create a release section while you're at it? Keep up the good efforts in what you do, everyone! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]