Talk:Manhole (2014 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.

Requested move 13 March 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manhole (film) → Manhole (2014 film) – There exist Manhole (2016 film) and no primary film. --Let There Be Sunshine 18:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). –Ammarpad (talk) 21:17, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support @Ammarpad: on what grounds did you contest @Let There Be Sunshine?: This is clear per WP:NCF. What's the problem?? In ictu oculi (talk) 22:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@In ictu oculi: "Technical move request" is for clear-cut cases of mistake in name or crystal-clear need for move due to technical limitations. Claiming this is "primary topic" or not is out of that scope. Interpreting guideline WP:NCF and determining "no primary topic" for so- so title is handled through discussion not technical request venue. Once there's element of doubt in technical request, the wise thing to do is initiate discussion. –Ammarpad (talk) 23:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but there's no doubt here. Fair enough. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly support per nom - no primary film. Paintspot Infez (talk) 12:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support to disambiguate two film articles, neither being the primary topic, from each other. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 14:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.