This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles
What is the notability of this island that is deserves its own article? Should such a small island be a section in the article for the archipelago? - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this. As I understand it, this Island is not ...
A Populated, legally-recognized place, nor
A Populated place without legal recognition, nor
A Disputed region, nor
A Named natural feature where information beyond statistics and coordinates is given in the article.
Comparing this to the example in the guideline you quote (a river island with no information available except the name and the location should probably be described in the article on the river), this is a coral island with no information available other than the location and sovereignty that should be described in the article about the archipelago. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 03:51, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]