Talk:Manavya

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Manavya article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Very funny tag

The article clearly states that Manavya is an organization and there is BLP tag which user Adamgerber80 had applied! -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 10:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original research tag?

User Adamgerber80 has applied original research tag to this article after removing previous tag. I am not able to understand what makes one think that there is original research in this article. What is the meaning of original research? -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 03:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many newspaper references are available

Addressed suggestions

I was a big contributor to this page, but I am definitely not associated with this organization in any way. I just didn't understand when I first started editing Wikipedia to avoid primary sources, and how much information to include or not include. I removed everything from this article that wasn't notable, got rid of primary sources, and added secondary sources. I think it's a very solid article now but please give further suggestions.Plantlady223 (talk) 17:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]